Why does this not surprise me? Anyone who has been on the administrative side of anything knows that large institutions aren't interested in measuring things that are hard to measure. They only want to be able to collect easily collected data, whether those data are meaningful or not, then twist the results to the desired outcome and tout how "objective" they're being.
MIT, while seemingly not quite as fraudulent as the SPLC, has plenty of reason to be ashamed of itself. The essentiial question is whether it will change its errant ways.
Wow, this is amazing. MIT is no longer the institution I recall from decades ago, clearly.
For a year or two, I kept a file of links to articles about election fraud and shenanigans in the US because so many nincompoops had told me repeatedly that I was mentally deranged for suggesting that US elections have issues. With minimal effort, one can find tremendous volumes of documentation of problems such as people being sent to prison for corruption of the process, months of testimony under oath of whistleblowers, confessions of those engaged in voter fraud, lawyers suing to maintain corrupt voter rolls, peer-reviewed papers on problems with US elections, media reviews of US election difficulties and the like. I compiled a list of hundreds or even thousands of examples of these in a very short period of time. If I had been doing it professionally and been seeking out material in a serious manner, I could have undoubtedly made a list 100 times as long in the same period of time.
One of my favorite examples is the Georgia State Senate hearings on voter fraud. For 4 or 5 months, a daily parade of a dozen or more came to testify under oath. Some of these were poll watchers. Some of these were whistleblowers from Dominion Voting Systems. Others were journalists who had uncovered fraud. Some were lawyers and data analysts and law enforcement officers and similar "experts". Yet somehow, all of this testimony made zero impact on anyone, even people living in Georgia, who still blithely maintain to me that there is no evidence of fraud and never was.
We have pretty good evidence of the blackmailing of government officials, along with death threats and even murders in Georgia to convince the officials to turn a blind eye to the fraud. But sure, nothing to see here folks, just move along. No one cares. People are SO incredibly partisan that they just want to ignore EVERYTHING. It is amazing to me. I have almost given up at this point. No one seems to care.
The American experiment hangs in the balance. Most people do not seem to give a damn.
What an expose! Another example how politicized institutions replace their original purpose with political goals.
Why does this not surprise me? Anyone who has been on the administrative side of anything knows that large institutions aren't interested in measuring things that are hard to measure. They only want to be able to collect easily collected data, whether those data are meaningful or not, then twist the results to the desired outcome and tout how "objective" they're being.
Excellent exposé.
MIT, while seemingly not quite as fraudulent as the SPLC, has plenty of reason to be ashamed of itself. The essentiial question is whether it will change its errant ways.
Wow, this is amazing. MIT is no longer the institution I recall from decades ago, clearly.
For a year or two, I kept a file of links to articles about election fraud and shenanigans in the US because so many nincompoops had told me repeatedly that I was mentally deranged for suggesting that US elections have issues. With minimal effort, one can find tremendous volumes of documentation of problems such as people being sent to prison for corruption of the process, months of testimony under oath of whistleblowers, confessions of those engaged in voter fraud, lawyers suing to maintain corrupt voter rolls, peer-reviewed papers on problems with US elections, media reviews of US election difficulties and the like. I compiled a list of hundreds or even thousands of examples of these in a very short period of time. If I had been doing it professionally and been seeking out material in a serious manner, I could have undoubtedly made a list 100 times as long in the same period of time.
One of my favorite examples is the Georgia State Senate hearings on voter fraud. For 4 or 5 months, a daily parade of a dozen or more came to testify under oath. Some of these were poll watchers. Some of these were whistleblowers from Dominion Voting Systems. Others were journalists who had uncovered fraud. Some were lawyers and data analysts and law enforcement officers and similar "experts". Yet somehow, all of this testimony made zero impact on anyone, even people living in Georgia, who still blithely maintain to me that there is no evidence of fraud and never was.
We have pretty good evidence of the blackmailing of government officials, along with death threats and even murders in Georgia to convince the officials to turn a blind eye to the fraud. But sure, nothing to see here folks, just move along. No one cares. People are SO incredibly partisan that they just want to ignore EVERYTHING. It is amazing to me. I have almost given up at this point. No one seems to care.
The American experiment hangs in the balance. Most people do not seem to give a damn.
MIT? . . . Mostly Inane Technology?