Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anna Krylov's avatar

Harsh but well justified. And yes -- we must save STEM from the lunatics.

Expand full comment
Judy Parrish's avatar

Well, I wouldn't have put it in such harsh terms, but bravo. I've sometimes fantasized about winning the lottery and establishing a rigorous STEM-emphasis college. Back in reality, I was chilled when Clinton (Bill, that is--remember him?) pretty much said everyone should go to college. Everyone in his right mind knows that when the supply of something (in this case college graduates) becomes abundant, the value goes down; in other words, the salary payoff for having a degree would decrease (except in STEM). I knew right then and there that college would be increasingly dumbed down. No further comment required. Even while I was still a professor (and later, dean), I was encouraging my colleagues to think forward a bit to how higher education must change in the light of the democratization of knowledge, but the conviction that they must be gatekeepers was too strong. I have also been dismayed at how that dumbing down, which has been going on a long time now, has affected research rigor even in STEM (my discipline is in STEM). It used to be that even colleagues who were making just incremental advances in their fields could recognize breakthrough scholarship when they saw it; now, I'm not so sure. Having said that, though....I'm also retired, but I endowed a small award for graduate students at the school I retired from. Yesterday I attended the PhD defense of the first student to win that award. I was greatly heartened because his dissertation was excellent. There is hope yet. At least in STEM.

Expand full comment
71 more comments...

No posts