Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quarrelsome Life's avatar

Dr Hanley,

I do not wish this to come across as crass. But taking the WIV reports as conclusive seems somewhat akin to asking a student suspected of academic foul play to grade their own paper.

Moreover, the claim that people have ignored those scientists on the natural origins side might be accurate in 2025, but it was the lab origins proponents who across 2020-22 were presented to the public by the establishment as "conspiracy theorists" / "Sinophobes" / "racists" etc. This massively shut down open debate on an unbelievably important topic. (I previously wrote about this politically correct suppression of debate in these very pages https://hxstem.substack.com/p/surety-brings-ruin )

While not a subject matter expert capable of evaluating the biology, the vast body of evidence put forth by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley, for example, is extremely convincing. As such, do you have a recommendation for a written/video rebuttal against the arguments put forth in their book Viral?

Thank you for the article and, in advance, for your time in reading this comment.

God Bless,

Ciaràn.

Expand full comment
steven lightfoot's avatar

This is not my area of expertise, at all, but the US funded gain of function research carried out at Wuhan (proven) and all the suppressed e-mail traffic on the theory by Fauci and others in the business sure makes it looks like Wuhan had something to do with it.

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts