Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sadredin Moosavi's avatar

Excellent. It should be noted that the idea that university employees including faculty, staff and STUDENTS serving on university committees in the conduct system are immune from prosecution for their actions is a farce too many in academia believe. This was established in the case Silva vs. University of New Hampshire (1994) vis a vis a Title IX case against an English professor accused of sexual harassing 7 female students by use of 2 analogies in a large English class. (One was the example of a bowl of jello on a vibrator as a metamophor for a belly dancer.) After case that lasted 2 years the courts ruled in Professor Silva's favor restoring this tenured faculty member to the classroom and awarding him back pay, damages and legal fees that cost the university hundreds of thousands of dollars. The judge went on to rule that the manner in which the university had handled the case was so far from any possible interpretation of the due process required of the American legal system that the members of the boards and committees could be held individually and personally liable for their conduct. If we all started suing Deans, Title IX Officers, and the faculty and staff serving on these kangaroo courts, their power would quickly evaporate. It does require something that faculty have in short supply, however, personal courage and integrity.

Expand full comment
Nan Zhong's avatar

I am in Santa Monica this week to observe the court sessions. If anyone is interested in a daily brief, please email me (nanzhong1@gmail.com). BTW, our racial discrimination lawsuits against the University of California, the University of Washington, the University of Michigan and Cornell are suing the senior administrators in their personal capacities too.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts